Author Topic: More retarded blathering  (Read 2241 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

StillJonesing

  • Sophomore
  • *
  • Posts: 701
on: July 17, 2011, 05:33:29 pm
mid level could probably be said about the recruits that uncw or ecu or programs bring in.


Not really, since those schools are bringing in zero, one, and two star guys.  I do get your point, I just don't think what Telep said was inaccurate.

There isn't a hill a beans difference in the players we get. We both get  mid level guys that have major deficiencies in their game. If schools at this level do get an occational highly touted player he's likely an overhyped one that other schools backed off of, faded in their development, or has grade problems/ trouble with the law. That's just how it works, and if you get to many your probably cheating like UCF. At that this level it's about getting the kind of players to fit a style that maximises their talents and minimises their weakness as well as getting them to stay 4 years and hoping one or two develops into complete players.
 
We recruit the same caliber of players and your kidding your self if you think there is much of a difference. Most of the guys we have had on the team recently/currently also had BCS/top mid major offers. Never really been a talent issue here, we've had enough to be good, our problems of past was that our players transferred to places like Pitt, Tennessee, Wichita St, UTEP, Utah etc. after a year or two and we never had any expereince or continuity until last year. Guy like Brock Young, Abrams, Morrow were all solid recruits as good or better than any on your team and you see things turned out better as upperclassmen with better coaching.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2011, 05:44:15 pm by StillJonesing »
You know it


itsbraille49

  • MemberPF
  • Assistant Coach
  • ***
  • Posts: 3707
  • I used to be arrogant, but now I'm perfect.
    • Green Tinted Glasses
Reply #1 on: July 17, 2011, 07:20:04 pm
mid level could probably be said about the recruits that uncw or ecu or programs bring in.


Not really, since those schools are bringing in zero, one, and two star guys.  I do get your point, I just don't think what Telep said was inaccurate.

There isn't a hill a beans difference in the players we get. We both get  mid level guys that have major deficiencies in their game. If schools at this level do get an occational highly touted player he's likely an overhyped one that other schools backed off of, faded in their development, or has grade problems/ trouble with the law. That's just how it works, and if you get to many your probably cheating like UCF. At that this level it's about getting the kind of players to fit a style that maximises their talents and minimises their weakness as well as getting them to stay 4 years and hoping one or two develops into complete players.
 
We recruit the same caliber of players and your kidding your self if you think there is much of a difference. Most of the guys we have had on the team recently/currently also had BCS/top mid major offers. Never really been a talent issue here, we've had enough to be good, our problems of past was that our players transferred to places like Pitt, Tennessee, Wichita St, UTEP, Utah etc. after a year or two and we never had any expereince or continuity until last year. Guy like Brock Young, Abrams, Morrow were all solid recruits as good or better than any on your team and you see things turned out better as upperclassmen with better coaching.

If there wasn't much difference your team would have been in an NCAA Tournament since the early 90s. Have you dusted your mother's skeleton yet today?

C-Pip's right.  About EVERYTHING.

Quote
(11:24:23) stonecoldken: CPip is the Cornbread of Engineers.



VA49er

  • Head Coach
  • ****
  • Posts: 5795
Reply #2 on: July 18, 2011, 09:46:16 am
If there wasn't much difference your team would have been in an NCAA Tournament since the early 90s. Have you dusted your mother's skeleton yet today?

Yeah, at least he admits ECU's midlevel guys have sucked.  I mean, if we have the same types of guys and given the records, well, yeah, ECU's guys have sucked for the most part.


zerogeneticsdc

  • Assistant Coach
  • ***
  • Posts: 3526
Reply #3 on: July 18, 2011, 02:55:29 pm
Didn't ECU take a guy that we didn't take back?
The University of Charlotte? I think so.

Representing Niner Nation on Rocky Top since 2010.


NLP

  • Guest
Reply #4 on: August 31, 2011, 10:48:41 am
http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/basketball/recruiting/rankings/rank-2509

No ECU commits on that list.  Charlotte commit on that list. 

I DRINK YOUR MILKSHAKE
I DRINK IT UP!


 

* Charlotte 49ers News

* State of Charlotte

* Videos